Improving Efficiency to Increase Competition Act: Burdens of Bayh-Dole

by Dennis Crouch
The Leading pro-IP Senators, Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Chris Coons (D-DE) recently introduced a bill focusing on patents stemming from research paid-for by federal grants. The proposed legislation, titled the “ Improving Efficiency to Increase Competition Act ,” would require a government study on reporting requirements related to the landmark Bayh-Dole Act of 1980.


One Pager
Bill Text

Bayh-Dole enables universities and others to retain intellectual property rights over inventions developed using federal funding. Under the Act, federal grant recipients can obtain patents on their federally-funded inventions while the government retains certain rights, most notably “march-in” rights allowing agencies to license such patents to additional parties under certain circumstances. Bayh-Dole has been hugely impactful in promoting commercialization of academic research, facilitating university-industry technology transfer, and driving America’s leadership in innovation. However, the Act also imposes various reporting requirements on grant recipients related to their federally-funded patents and inventions, which some argue have become outdated and burdensome to innovators.
The Biden Administration recently signaled an enhanced focus on exercising “march-in” rights under the Bayh-Dole Act to address high drug prices.  In December 2023, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) released draft guidance outlining how agencies can consider price as a factor when deciding whether to exercise march-in rights. This draft guidance follows President Biden’s 2021 executive order directing NIST to refrain from limiting march-in rights based on drug pricing alone. The Biden Administration’s embrace of march-in rights to target high drug prices sets the stage for responsive legislative action like the Improving Efficiency to Increase Competition Act .
What the Bill Requires :  The proposal would require the Comptroller General to provide a comprehensive report within one year analyzing areas for improvement in the Bayh-Dole Act disclosure system. As stated in the legislation:
The report required under paragraph (1) shall include, to the extent practicable, information on…Barriers that Federal reporting requirements … create for contractors to develop inventions…
The report would gather input from universities and other grantees of “various sizes, budgets, geographical positions, and specialties” on the obstacles created by reporting obligations.  In particular, the report asks for the following information:

The percentage of inventions not elected by contractors to retain after disclosure.
Statistics on extensions granted to contractors for disclosure, election, and filing.
How reporting requirements impact contractors’ ability to compete with foreign competitors.
How the government uses the reported information and suggested improvements.
Barriers created by the reporting requirements for developing inventions.
The time and effort institutions spend on Bayh-Dole Act compliance.
Contractors’ difficulties using the iEdison reporting system and recommendations.
Whether other agencies not using iEdison could benefit from a standard system.
The number of disclosure systems used by federal agencies.

Senator Coons explained the intention is to “support efforts to eliminate unnecessary red tape so that federal grantees can thrive, and their ideas can bolster national competitiveness.” (Coons press release)
The Bill has already obtained support from a number of stakeholders who receive federal research funding, including the Bayh-Dole Coalition; Association of American Universities (AAU); Association of Public and Land Grant Universities; University of Delaware; University of Colorado; Colorado State University; University of Nebraska System; Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation; and AUTM.