Highlights of the Week
Delhi HC in Sulphur Mills Limited v. Dharmaj Crop Guard Limited & Ors.– Case of Credible Challenge to the Validity of the Patent
Recently, the DHC found Sulphur Mills’ patent on sulphur-based agrochemical fertilizer to be obvious and consequently refused to grant them an interim injunction against multiple defendants. In this guest post, Kartikeya Tandon discusses the DHC decision. Read on to know more.
Who’s Looking at the Quality of Decisions Granting Patents? Some Concerns from the Man Truck v. Asst. Controller Case
Is short always sweet? Recently, the DHC directed the IPO to reconsider its rejection order in the Man Truck v. Asst Controller case. Surprisingly, the IPO made a “U turn” on its initial finding merely 29 days after, in barely 5 lines. Praharsh and Aarav discuss this controversy in this co authored post and highlight what can be implications of such reversals.
DHC’s Concerning Order in Kudos Pharmaceuticals v. Natco Pharma: Will it lead to Evergreening?
Coverage, Disclosure, and Evergreening: In discussing the recent order regarding the Olaparib patent infringement, Yogesh raises some concerns about the Court’s findings on obviousness, the missing elements of the three-factor test, and the sidelined public interest.
Other Posts
Journey Through “February” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present)
Image from here
A little late but worth the wait
